Please Don’t Fix My Cholesterol.
“You have high cholesterol”; “Your cholesterol is a little bit on the high side”; “We need to do something about that high cholesterol of yours”; “You’re in pretty good shape for someone your age, apart from slightly high cholesterol…but we’ll fix that.”
Does that sound familiar? I appreciate the concern, but do me a favor. Please don’t ‘fix’ my cholesterol. Because I know what you mean when you say that. I know what you’re going to do to try to bring the numbers down. You’re going to give me a statin, aren’t you? Or maybe you’ll recommend more of the ‘heart healthy’ cholesterol lowering oils. Anything to get me into the ‘healthy range’ right?
I know you’re the expert but it concerns me that you don’t properly understand cholesterol. I mean, you don’t sound like you are aware of what it is or what it does. You don’t seem to know what it means if it is or isn’t in the healthy range. And I get the feeling you won’t understand why I don’t want you to just do ‘anything it takes’ to bring it down, because you don’t actually know what damage you’re doing when you do that.
I’m aware that some might say I’m exaggerating, or that I’m going on about this issue unnecessarily. They might even go as far as to call me a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy nut. But thankfully there is still some good biology available for those willing to spend some time reading, even if it does mean reading things that don’t come up at the top of an internet search. You might read a few biological experiments or even a biology textbook or two, although these things are no guarantee anymore, but it is a start.
The truth is genuine good quality information isn’t necessarily that hard to find, but most people, including health professionals, don’t have a lot of time to search for it. It’s far easier to be spoon fed information by the so called authorities. So I think some real cholesterol information needs to be brought to light to at least begin to reverse some conditioning or brainwashing that has taken lots of time and money to cement.
Decades worth of fear mongering misinformation regarding cholesterol and a few related things has created what can be described as a deeply entrenched belief system, so much so that the term ‘high cholesterol’ is able to evoke an immediate sense of unease or foreboding.
Objectively speaking (if that’s still allowed), cholesterol isn’t anywhere near the problem it is made out to be. Actually, it isn’t a problem at all, at least not the way ‘they’ say it is. But much like with some other things (hint hint, sugar) it can become involved with other problems, and then get wrongly blamed for those problems.
The truth about cholesterol is it’s there to help you. You don’t want to get rid of it. You don’t want to interfere with it’s production. And you definitely don’t need to worry about the cholesterol content in food. And even though it might sound wrong, you don’t want to bring it down into the ‘healthy range’, at least not using the methods most commonly recommended.
What you want is for your cholesterol to be somewhere near the ‘normal’ range, due to your metabolism being close to ‘normal’. Not because you took something that creates the impression that you’re healthy on paper, when in truth you’re less healthy than before the cholesterol was ‘fixed’.
So in other words the solution to high cholesterol isn’t to attack cholesterol per se. The cholesterol is high for a reason, but high cholesterol isn’t the reason. Just like the solution to an out of control bush fire isn’t to send the firefighters home, even though chances are you’ll keep finding them at the scenes of bushfires. They are there to help, so be glad when they arrive.
I know it’s a simplistic analogy. Perhaps it’s a little more complicated than that, but you get the point right? What you want to do is deal with the issues that cause the fires (or that stop firefighters from being able to effectively do their job), not blame the firefighters because they’re at the scene of the fires, doing their best to help.
Cholesterol is biologically necessary. You really don’t want to see what happens if you aren’t able to produce it. You don’t want to mess with your ability to make cholesterol, but that’s basically what the standard treatments do, just to lower your numbers.
Cholesterol plays a fundamental role in the production of numerous specialized highly protective anti-stress substances, including pregnenolone, progesterone, DHEA, testosterone, vitamin D, and bile. A well functioning thyroid metabolism is basically what’s required for cholesterol to get converted properly.
So if your blood cholesterol levels are rising, rather than it being a sign you have too much cholesterol (sneaky cholesterol), it’s more likely a sign something is interfering with thyroid energy metabolism and it’s preventing cholesterol from being effectively converted and used in a more specialized way.
But unconverted cholesterol is still helpful in its own right. Cholesterol has immune system functions, is anti-inflammatory, and directly protects against infection, poison, and all sorts of toxins. So another way to understand ‘high cholesterol’ is that you might be producing extra cholesterol as a protective response to stress or some form of toxicity.
And another thing that should be mentioned is that there is lots of evidence pointing to the fact that rising cholesterol as you age, helps keep you alive. Low cholesterol on the other hand is very dangerous and makes you more susceptible to many degenerative conditions, most commonly cancer.
So you could say rising cholesterol is protecting you in the background when your health is not optimal, when you’re under a lot of stress, and your metabolism is under functioning. That means cholesterol is probably the last thing you want to try to get rid of.
In any case, that doesn’t mean you can’t do things to improve your situation, which end up lowering cholesterol. Just not the way most people are told. You need to look at it differently. What you can do is try to identify the underlying issues causing the increased cholesterol. If you deal with those, the ‘cholesterol issue’ will improve. That’s completely different. Then you’re not getting rid of cholesterol, you’re getting rid of the reason cholesterol is rising.
Do you have an infection or are you being exposed to things that promote stress, causing you to produce more cholesterol? Is something interfering with the conversion of cholesterol into the protective substances? That can be anything that interferes with thyroid function, or maybe just a vitamin A deficiency.
By improving overall metabolism you can ameliorate the issues responsible for problems associated with cholesterol, and the consumption of polyunsaturated fats (PUFAs) and sugar avoidance are two common metabolism inhibiting factors.
The PUFAs are promoted as being ‘heart healthy’, mostly because they lower cholesterol levels but they do this not by improving metabolism and cholesterol conversion, but by interfering (a bit like statins) with cholesterol production.
What’s worse the PUFAs damage cholesterol, promote inflammation, and powerfully prevent thyroid energy system function making them anything but good for health or for the heart. They get marketed as being good for ‘fixing’ cholesterol issues, but what they’re really good at is causing the problems that then get blamed on cholesterol.
Sugar, on the other hand, helps with cholesterol production, fuels thyroid energy metabolism, improves cholesterol conversion, and generally lowers stress. As a result, sugar reduces cholesterol requirements and protects against exposure to PUFAs released out of storage due to excessive stress. So sugar is good at fixing the problems that get used to make cholesterol into the bad guy.
I’m not a doctor or dietician and this isn’t medical or nutritional advice, but from what I have read and seen and experienced, this is a logical and coherent way to understand cholesterol. I don’t believe the official theory holds up, and continuously adding to it doesn’t help it make more sense. So it’s worth looking at the science which contradicts the mainstream view, and there’s plenty of it.
If you like what I have to say and you want even more information (including lots of studies) demonstrating metabolically sound ways to look at cholesterol, please check out my other articles on cholesterol, including To Hell With Cholesterol Phobia and Cholesterol Culture Comeback.
Copyright 2021, by Dan M @ CowsEatGrass. All rights reserved (except for quotations and images having their own protected copyrights). This copyright protects author-publisher Dan M’s right to future publication of his work in any manner, in any and all media — utilizing technology now known or hereafter devised — throughout the world in perpetuity. Everything described in this publication is for information purposes only. The author-publisher, Dan M, is not directly or indirectly presenting or recommending any part of this publication’s data as a diagnosis or prescription for any ailment of any reader. If anyone uses this information without the advice of their professional health adviser, they are prescribing for themselves, and the author- publisher assumes no responsibility or liability. Persons using any of this data do so at their own risk and must take personal responsibility for what they don’t know as well as for what they do know.
See more here
Brescianini S, Maggi S, Farchi G, Mariotti S, Di Carlo A, Baldereschi M, Inzitari D; ILSA Group. Low total cholesterol and increased risk of dying: are low levels clinical warning signs in the elderly? Results from the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):991-6.
Okuyama H, Langsjoen PH, Hamazaki T, Ogushi Y, Hama R, Kobayashi T, Uchino H. Statins stimulate atherosclerosis and heart failure: pharmacological mechanisms. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;8(2):189-99.
Rauchhaus M, Clark AL, Doehner W, Davos C, Bolger A, Sharma R, Coats AJ, Anker SD. The relationship between cholesterol and survival in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Dec 3;42(11):1933-40.