Selective Serotonin Memories.

PharmaPain “To our knowledge, there is not a single peer-reviewed article that can be accurately cited to directly support claims of serotonin deficiency in any mental disorder, while there are many articles that present counter evidence…What remains unmeasured, though, is how many patients seek help from their doctor because antidepressant advertisements have convinced them that they are suffering from a serotonin deficiency” (Lacasse JR, Leo J. 2005)

Not to mention the probably indeterminable number of deaths from suicide associated with – and potentially attributable to – antidepressant use.

And then there is the scientifically demonstrated relationship between excessive serotonin levels, and the promotion of issues with regards to chronic inflammation and disease.

Unfortunately the official story in relation to the connection between depression (as well as mental disorders in general) and serotonin, exists independently of the vast majority of well performed experimental science.

Instead, it relies mostly upon unfounded assumptions, repeated dogma, misleading interpretations, as well as misrepresented outcomes and in some cases, intentionally dishonest results.

“The incongruence between the scientific literature and the claims made in FDA-regulated SSRI advertisements is remarkable, and possibly unparalleled…Professor Emeritus of Neuroscience Elliot Valenstein summarized the scientific data by concluding, “What physicians and the public are reading about mental illness is by no means a neutral reflection of all the information that is available” ” (Lacasse JR, Leo J. 2005)

It simply does not make sense – from any kind of biologically rational viewpoint – for rising levels of substances known to be directly involved in the development and worsening of all kinds of degeneration and disease, to be given a label such as that which has been popularly attached to serotonin.

Only in a world where properly carried out experimentation takes a backseat to corporate influenced publications and related marketing and propaganda, could serotonin be in any way deserving of being named the ‘happy hormone’.

Sadly, the deeply entrenched and long held belief that doctors – when making recommendations and prescribing medications – are not simply repeating information fed to them, but rather, have a well rounded understanding of the physiology of disease – and how it relates to things such as nutrition and pharmacology – continues to be powerfully supported by existing cultural structures.

On what basis do you think most doctors make the decision to prescribe an SSRI – or other similarly acting antidepressants – for you or anyone you know?

Copyright 2021, by Dan M @ CowsEatGrass. All rights reserved (except for quotations and images having their own protected copyrights). This copyright protects author-publisher Dan M’s right to future publication of his work in any manner, in any and all media — utilizing technology now known or hereafter devised — throughout the world in perpetuity. Everything described in this publication is for information purposes only. The author-publisher, Dan M, is not directly or indirectly presenting or recommending any part of this publication’s data as a diagnosis or prescription for any ailment of any reader. If anyone uses this information without the advice of their professional health adviser, they are prescribing for themselves, and the author- publisher assumes no responsibility or liability. Persons using any of this data do so at their own risk and must take personal responsibility for what they don’t know as well as for what they do know.

See More Here

Lacasse JR, Leo J. Serotonin and depression: a disconnect between the advertisements and the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 2005 Dec;2(12):e392.

#serotoninsucks
#pharmaagenda

Image: “Stream of Coniousness” Comandrews

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *